Skip to main content

Scope 3 Emissions

Harvard’s Value Chain

What are Scope 3 Emissions?

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol classifies an organization’s GHG emissions into three “scopes” for tracking and reporting:

  • Scope 1: Direct emissions from operations that are owned or controlled by an organization. At Harvard, Scope 1 emissions include our on-campus district energy systems, building-level fossil fuel infrastructure for heating/cooling (e.g., gas boilers), and our vehicle fleet.
  • Scope 2: Indirect emissions from the generation of purchased energy consumed by an organization. At Harvard, our Scope 2 emissions come from electricity we purchase from the regional electric grid.
  • Scope 3: Indirect “value chain” emissions across 15 broad categories related to an organization’s upstream and downstream activities. For most organizations, including Harvard, Scope 3 emissions are far larger than Scope 1 and 2 emissions combined.

Mission: Whether it is food in our dining halls or materials we use to construct new buildings, Harvard aims to reduce Scope 3 emissions across priority categories, without introducing harms to health.

Reducing Emissions from Purchased Goods & Services: Where to Begin?

Sustainability and procurement staff from Harvard, MIT, Stanford, and Yale convened a small ad hoc working group to identify a shorter list of Scope 3 emissions Purchased Goods & Services (PGS) and Capital Goods subcategories particularly relevant to higher education. First, we compared our institutions’ top 100 highest spend categories. Next, we defined “actionability” criteria and excluded the “least actionable” categories. Finally, we leveraged our offices’ past Scope 3 heatmapping and materiality exercises to identify likely hot spots (high emissions). The resulting shortlist includes areas that are likely to be both actionable and emissions hot spots. We hope this work can enable other research universities to leapfrog the initial PGS discovery stage and serve as a foundation for prioritization.

Read the full paper.


How we set priorities to maximize impact

Lifecycle emissions across the value chain are broad, complex, and involve many actors and sources that are not always within Harvard’s direct control, which makes it essential to prioritize action to maximize impact. 

Harvard has identified priority Scope 3 emissions categories: Construction, Food, Air Travel, Commuting, IT, and other Purchased Goods/Services. These priority categories were selected as areas where Harvard’s purchasing and action will have the largest impact to reduce emissions and drive market transformation — not only on our campus, but around the world.

Reducing Scope 3 Emissions

Spotlight: Construction

Reducing Scope 3 emissions in construction has a high impact both globally and locally. Nearly a quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions are from concrete, steel, and aluminum alone.

 

The embodied carbon in construction materials (e.g., concrete and steel) is difficult to decarbonize and the world urgently needs solutions, so Harvard is leveraging its research strengths and purchasing power to drive demand for healthier, lower-carbon materials in the built environment.

A complex graph shows the reasons Harvard chose construction as a priority area to lower Scope 3 emissions. The graph demonstrates that construction meets Scope 3 priorities because of its magnitude globally, difficulty of decarbonization, research strengths, and its magnitude at Harvard. It also has some near-term reduction opportunities.

How we determined Scope 3 priority areas:

  1. As a first step, we analyzed a snapshot of the University’s annual spending using the GHG Protocol’s Scope 3 Evaluator Tool. The output was a high-level emissions footprint which signaled Scope 3 “hot spots” for further exploration.
  2. Next, through the lens of five relevance criteria, we identified our current priority Scope 3 categories where our efforts and resources can have the most immediate impact at Harvard and beyond. Relevance criteria:
    • Magnitude at Harvard
    • Near-term reduction opportunities
    • Magnitude globally
    • Research strengths
    • Difficulty of decarbonization*
  3. Today, we are utilizing refined datasets and category-specific methodologies to establish baselines, reduce emissions, and track progress in those priority categories.  

*Decarbonization is the process of reducing and eliminating carbon emissions. 

Test, Pilot, Prove, Scale:

Reducing emissions within many of these categories will require innovation – so Harvard is committed to continuing to act as a living laboratory in order to pilot and prove scalable solutions that will not only help Harvard reduce its Scope 3 emissions but ideally help others, as well.


How we improve data to drive emissions reductions

Globally, Scope 3 is an emerging sustainability priority – but value chains are complex, and optimal emissions data does not exist for most procured goods and services. Despite these challenges, there are opportunities to take meaningful action while data quality improves throughout the value chain. 

Our Solution: Our Scope 3 strategy includes four phases for emissions reduction, all of which require increasingly more robust and decision-relevant data:

Heatmap graph that details how the improvement of data leads to reductions in emissions. Four stages of improvement include: 1. Data Discovery/Early Action; 2. Data-informed Targeted Action; 3. Evaluation/Deeper Reductions; 4. Continuous Improvement.
  1. Data discovery/early action: We begin with a “hot spot” emissions analysis using high-level purchasing data, allowing us to act on “low-hanging fruit” and high-impact reduction opportunities.
  2. Data-informed targeted action: We then create category-specific key performance indicators (KPIs) that enable us to: choose lower-emissions products and services where possible; implement behavior change interventions to reduce Scope 3 emissions; and track our progress. Meanwhile, we persistently demand product transparency and healthier materials from our suppliers – sending upstream market signals.
  3. Evaluation/deeper reductions: Once we have better data in a specific category, we can create more targeted policies and processes to achieve even deeper emissions reductions.
  4. Continuous improvement: As new knowledge, data, and technologies emerge, we will continue to reduce emissions and influence the market in ways that reduce emissions and advance health and wellbeing for all. 

Harvard asks its vendors and suppliers for emissions data whenever possible, and plans to work with other large organizations to send aligned market signals for more transparency and high-quality data. Harvard is also partnering with thought leaders like the World Resources Institute and our peers to improve Scope 3 emissions reporting standards that we and others follow. Meanwhile, we are not waiting to reduce emissions from Harvard’s priority categories.


How we leverage Harvard’s influence to amplify climate and health benefits

Graphic illustrating how the supply chain has equal impacts on climate, health, and wellbeing.
  • Harvard is using its purchasing power to positively influence the sourcing, manufacturing, and distribution of the goods and services we buy.
  • When we purchase from businesses that prioritize sustainable and ethical practices, we can produce a positive ripple effect across the market.
  • To transform the market, Harvard and other organizations can create high demand for lower-emissions products and services that also advance health at all stages of the value chain. This can positively impact upstream communities (e.g., asking vendors to remove toxic chemicals in building products) and our campus community (e.g., serving nutritious plant-forward meals in our dining halls). 

featured

How We Operate

Harvard is accelerating new systems that enable healthier, low-carbon living—creating systems that can be scaled and adopted more broadly.

Learn More
Buses from Harvard Shuttle Services pick up students at The Science and Engineering Complex (SEC) as people pass by on Bluebikes. Kris Snibbe/Harvard Staff Photographer

HARVARD’S

Sustainability Action Plan

View the full plan

Screenshot of the cover of Harvard's Sustainability Action Plan against a background of solar panels.
September

18

Multi-day Event

Global to Local to Global Geodesign for Climate Change Mitigation | (GLG) Workshop

Friday 9/18 12pm-1pm – Introductory Presentation
Saturday 9/19 9am-5:30pm – GLG Workshop & Reception

The Global to Local to Global (GLG) Climate Mitigation Project, in collaboration with Esri, has initiated an innovative workflow to address climate change mitigation through a structured framework designed to implement global-to-local-to-global projects. The GLG strategy creates a scalable geodesign workflow compatible across global, Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and diverse jurisdictions and geographic scales directed to projected environmental changes by 2050. It utilizes climate science and optimization designs to inform national to local designs– which, in turn, informs national and global policy, as local implementation is vital for building climate resilience.

Geodesign – design at geographic scale – provides a collaborative approach that integrates multiple disciplines and uses geographical information systems (GIS)-based analytic and design tools to help explore alternative future scenarios in response to stated problems. In this workshop, participants will work in groups to simulate commitments to climate mitigation projects at the regional or local scale, in consultation with national NDCs, climate, land use, land cover, and bio-regional data and their projections to 2050. Their selections will be used to quickly generate a global geospatial model of climate-driven scenarios resulting from combined mitigation actions, to which groups will be asked to respond to how global and national outcomes may inform future design conditions.

This in-person workshop is open to all from Harvard/MIT and participants from the broader academic community. No prior knowledge of GIS is required.

September

17

Thursday
3:30 pm-4:30 pm GMT+0000

OEB Seminar Series: Randi Rotjan

Randi Rotjan , Associate Professor of Biology , Tufts University | Protecting Global Oceans in the Anthropocene

Abstract: The oceans are 71% of our planet, and yet are still largely unexplored, especially in the deep and open oceans. New species are discovered on almost every deep-sea dive, and even with increased exploration efforts, we are still discovering massive underwater mountains, canyons, and other features. Yet, even with so much unknown, decisions cannot wait for discovery. In an era of global change, biological communities in even the most remote parts of our planet are feeling the impact of human societies and are vulnerable to depletion or extinction. To combat this, global targets for protection have set a goal of protecting 30% of oceans by 2030. This seminar will unpack the science behind large scale marine conservation, and discuss how to explore the unexplored, and how to protect the unprotected.

September

16

Wednesday
4:30 pm-5:30 pm GMT+0000

Harvard Voices on Climate Change: El Niño In a Warming World

The Salata Institute and the Harvard Alumni Association invite you to the latest installment of Harvard Voices on Climate Change, a virtual series featuring Harvard faculty and fellows on different dimensions of the climate challenge.

This session will explore El Niño in a warming world and what a changing climate could mean for this powerful driver of global weather patterns. Featuring Peter Huybers, Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Professor of Environmental Science and Engineering, the discussion will examine how our understanding of El Niño is evolving, its far-reaching impacts, and what we may expect as the planet continues to warm.